CT: Last person to contact victim alive was PC for his phone

Defendant was sexually involved with the victim, and he apparently was the last person to see her alive, and had contact with her after she disappeared. That was probable cause. State v. Johnson, 2026 Conn. LEXIS 19 (Feb. 3, 2026).

Defendant lost in state court on his Fourth Amendment claim, so there’s no ineffective assistance of counsel claim in habeas. Cunningham v. Cargor, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22217 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2026).*

Defendant seen alleged to be burning clothes he wore in a robbery in his grill in his yard was not protected because it could be seen from off the property. United States v. Flounoury, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22269 (D. Mass. Jan. 21, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.