D.N.J.: Car leasing company had no 4A claim to car’s lawful impoundment, despite not knowing for 11 months

Honda leased a car that was impounded and towed from the driver because it was unlicensed. Eleven months later Honda located the car and there were thousands of accumulated fees. Honda sued under § 1983. The initial seizure was valid under the community caretaking function. “Honda’s argument that the impounding became unconstitutional when the Township allegedly gave Malanga a ‘possessory lien’ in the car and attached ‘conditions’ on the car’s release is an unpersuasive framing of what really happened here. Under the community caretaker exception, the police officers conducted a traffic stop and directed Malanga to remove an unregistered, uninsured vehicle from the road pursuant to their duties to protect public safety under New Jersey law. Such a practice does not violate the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.” It also was not a deprivation of property without due process of law nor a taking without just compensation. Honda Lease Tr. v. Butler Twp., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114230 (D.N.J. June 28, 2024).

2255 petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim was waived by his guilty plea. United States v. Hamm, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114342 (E.D. Ky. June 28, 2024).*

An unverified computer database alert on defendant’s car plus its travel route was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Witt, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114572 (D. Ariz. June 12, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113283 (D. Ariz. June 28, 2024).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.