D.Minn.: Regular CI had “extensive knowledge of street gangs, firearms, and narcotics distribution”; there was PC

The CI had “extensive knowledge of street gangs, firearms, and narcotics distribution,” and he’d been providing information for three months. The officers corroborated what they could. What little omissions there were in the affidavit weren’t material to the finding of probable cause. United States v. Cage, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45847 (D. Minn. Mar. 15, 2024).*

Plaintiff’s unlawful detention suit loses to summary judgment because he didn’t respond to requests for admissions. “Because the undisputed facts establish that Lt. Bernklau did not fabricate evidence that would result in Conant’s unlawful pretrial detention, Lt. Bernklau is entitled to summary judgment on Conant’s claim.” Conant v. Bernklau, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45892 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 14, 2024).*

No claim under Fourth Amendment, ADA, Title VII, or due process clause. Time barred; wrong venue. Emrit v. Grammy Awards on CBS, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46489 (D. Wyo. Feb. 9, 2024).* [Why is this case still going on?]

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.