D.Ariz.: Govt’s civil discovery demands don’t implicate the 4A

When the government is sued, its discovery demands do not implicate the Fourth Amendment. Arizona Yage Assembly v. Barr, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42197 (D. Ariz. Feb. 22, 2024).

The obtaining of defendants CSLI before Carpenter was lawful then, and the good faith exception applies. Ramos v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41938 (D. Md. Mar. 11, 2024).*

Defendant’s traffic stop was justified at its inception, although it turned out there was no violation. Still, the officer had reasonable suspicion to prolong the stop based on a known and reliable CI’s information. United States v. Swartz, No. 2:23-CR-00047-DCLC-CRW-3, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42327 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 11, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.