NY Albany Co.: Overbroad location data search remedied by narrowing to two hours

The search warrant for defendant’s location data for the week before and week after the crime was overbroad. The court instead allows the state to use the hour before and hour after. People v. Williams, 2023 NY Slip Op 23137, 2023 NYLJ LEXIS 1216 (Albany Co. May 8, 2023).

Habeas petitioner gets a full and fair opportunity to litigate a search in state court, not that he adequately used it. Soler-Norona v. Floyd, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 11695 (6th Cir. May 11, 2023).*

Habeas petitioner had a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Arizona search in his West Virginia criminal case, so he’s barred by Stone. Rydbom v. Ames, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84152 (S.D. W. Va. May 11, 2023).*

Leave to appeal denied. A person with apparent authority consented to a search of the property, among other things. Appellant loses on all grounds he submits. People v. Gamez, 2023 Mich. App. LEXIS 3359 (May 11, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Issue preclusion, Overbreadth. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.