E.D.Tenn.: Mislabeling SW attachments not worthy of exclusion

Accidental reverse numbering of Attachments A and B didn’t make the search warrant void. United States v. Deakins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60866 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 6, 2023).*

Plaintiff’s claim that the Director of National Intelligence violates the Fourth Amendment by mind reading him doesn’t state a plausible claim. Sherven v. Office of the Dir. of Nat’l Intel., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60405 (D.D.C. Apr. 5, 2023).*

Plaintiff’s excessive force claim fails under qualified immunity because, when the officer was breaking up a fight, he got hit by plaintiff, too. Not an obviously clear case. Grandy v. Huenke, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 8235 (11th Cir. Apr. 6, 2023).*

State search warrants that end up in federal prosecutions are not evaluated under Rule 41. United States v. Jackson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60723 (W.D. La. Apr. 3, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Particularity, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.