NE: Failure to deliver SW to def not 4A violation and doesn’t warrant suppression

Defendant was the subject of a search warrant for a blood draw. The fact he wasn’t given a copy of the warrant doesn’t require reversal. He clearly knew what was going on. State v. Svendgard, 31 Neb. App. 596, 2023 Neb. App. LEXIS 54 (Feb. 14, 2023).

Bivens was against drug officers for a search. This case is against CBP for excessive force. This is a new Bivens context, and dismissed. Nash v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25671 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 14, 2023).*

The government’s motion for summary judgment on standing to contest the forfeiture was improperly granted. Taking the facts in claimant’s favor, he showed enough. United States v. $774,830.00 in United States Currency, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 3624 (6th Cir. Feb. 13, 2023).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule, Forfeiture, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.