D.C.Cir.: Question of fact remains on whether PC dissipated before second handcuffing

“We reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the false arrest claims for two reasons. First, there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether probable cause for the simple assault charge dissipated before Lin was handcuffed a second time and taken involuntarily to the police station. Second, there is a genuine issue of material fact as to the existence of probable cause to arrest Lin for assaulting a police officer.” Lin v. District of Columbia, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 25618 (D.C. Cir. Sep. 2, 2022).*

The automobile exception applies because there was probable cause. United States v. Davis, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164829 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 13, 2022).*

Defendant’s case was remanded only for resentencing, and he sought to raise a dog sniff issue under Jardines, which he couldn’t do. Herman v. United States, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 25635 (6th Cir. Sep. 13, 2022).*

No CoA on petitioner’s 2254 appeal on his Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the search was valid. West v. Artis, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 25628 (6th Cir. Sep. 12, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.