D.D.C.: JPMorgan complying with SDT to 1/6 committee not a 4A search

A third-party record keeper providing material to the January 6th Select Committee under subpoena is not a Fourth Amendment violation. “Here, under any of the above standards, it is plain that JPMorgan did not engage in state action when it complied with the congressional subpoena.” “Plaintiff may resist this conclusion, but as Star Trek’s Dr. Spock intoned, ‘Resistance is futile.’” Budowich v. Pelosi, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111563 (D.D.C. June 23, 2022).*

The Fourth Amendment does not apply to a denial of medical care in jail. “Despite this mountain of authority, Colson contends that the Fourth Amendment is the constitutional prism through which we should review her claims that the officers failed to provide her with medical care. Doing so, however, is not only at odds with legions of prior decisions, but also with the Amendment’s text itself.” Colson v. City of Alcoa, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 17340 (6th Cir. June 23, 2022).*

New crime during allegedly suspect traffic stop not suppressed. State v. Penman, 2022 N.M. App. LEXIS 34 (June 23, 2022).

Defendant as a passenger in car could be ordered out during a stop without any specific evidence he did anything wrong. United States v. Royster, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111284 (D.N.J. June 23, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.