OK: Lawyer’s telephone call seeking arrest of officers for trespass while they were executing SW results in disciplinary action

Respondent in this disciplinary action is a criminal defense lawyer. A client’s house was subjected to a search under a warrant. Once told, he got to the scene during the search and sought a copy of it, but he was rejected and told to go away. He did. He called the sheriff’s office and sought a copy and said that the officers should be prosecuted for trespass. He was charged with a false statement and obstruction. He was convicted of the false statement but acquitted of obstruction. The bar sought summary discipline, which is denied. State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass’n v. Wagner, 2022 OK 13, 2022 Okla. LEXIS 11 (Feb. 1, 2022) (4-3, the dissenters would censure). [More to the point, how is an officer trespassing when executing a search warrant within the terms of the warrant? See § 61.03 n.10.]

“Here, Plaintiff’s sparse allegations do not include any facts sufficient to show that the strip searches at issue were not legitimately related to penological interests or were designed to harass or punish him. Thus, Plaintiff’s allegations fall far short of alleging a plausible Section 1983 claim relating to the alleged strip searches.” Latham v. Dzurenda, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19141 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.