Daily Archives: March 13, 2025

M.D.Fla.: Not IAC to not call private searcher at suppression hearing where it wouldn’t have changed the outcome

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not calling a “hotel maid” who found defendant’s gun at the suppression hearing that led to his ACCA sentence. He doesn’t show that she would have changed the outcome. The private search issue was litigated … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance, Knock and announce | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Not IAC to not call private searcher at suppression hearing where it wouldn’t have changed the outcome

CA9: Jury verdict that officer violated clearly established rights and precluded qualified immunity

One defendant was not entitled to qualified immunity on the merits because the jury found that he violated plaintiff’s clearly established Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force by using deadly force when he posed no immediate threat. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Jury verdict that officer violated clearly established rights and precluded qualified immunity

WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

There was an objective basis for defendant’s stop, even if the officer had subjective motives. State v. Olson, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 423 (Mar. 11, 2025).* Defendant was in prison for about 20 years and there were phone calls between … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

CA5: Stay of § 1983 shooting case was properly denied pending state criminal case

Plaintiff was charged in state court and sued under § 1983 in federal court over his shooting by the police. The federal court refused a stay and plaintiff ended up taking the Fifth. The denial of the stay of the … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CA5: Stay of § 1983 shooting case was properly denied pending state criminal case

NPR: A little-known law is in the spotlight: What to know about the Privacy Act of 1974

NPR: A little-known law is in the spotlight: What to know about the Privacy Act of 1974 by Kathryn Fink, Ailsa Chang & Jeanette Woods (“The Privacy Act of 1974 protects personal information collected across federal agencies. Privacy groups and … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy | Comments Off on NPR: A little-known law is in the spotlight: What to know about the Privacy Act of 1974

CA8: Dog sniff at apt door was reasonable under existing precedent

A drug dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door was reasonable under well-established circuit precedent. There’s no evidence the dog’s nose went under the door. United States v. Peck, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5710 (8th Cir. Mar. 12, 2025). Plaintiff’s condition … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Dog sniff at apt door was reasonable under existing precedent

OR: Petr’s post-conviction 4A denied for lack of specifics and context

Defendant’s post-conviction Fourth Amendment claim was properly denied for not telling the court what evidence was improperly admitted, where it appears in the record, and how it affected the outcome. Zyst v. Kelly, 338 Or App 597 (Mar. 12, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OR: Petr’s post-conviction 4A denied for lack of specifics and context

D.Mass.: SnapChat warrant didn’t go stale after six months [would it ever?]

SnapChat warrant wasn’t stale: “The passage of more than six months between Cardoso’s messages to Pyrtle and issuance of the October 2021 warrant did not undermine probable cause to believe that data from Pyrtle’s Snapchat account would provide evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Social media warrants, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SnapChat warrant didn’t go stale after six months [would it ever?]

D.D.C.: Under Grubbs, a geofence de-anonymizer SW can’t be challenged before execution

Google responded to a series of search warrants for information and finally objected to a warrant to de-anonymize the information it previously provided. It can’t challenge the warrant before execution under Grubbs. Google LLC v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Under Grubbs, a geofence de-anonymizer SW can’t be challenged before execution

techdirt: Appeals Court: ‘Plain View” Also Includes Using iPhone Camera Options To See Through Tinted Car Windows

techdirt: Appeals Court: ‘Plain View” Also Includes Using iPhone Camera Options To See Through Tinted Car Windows by Tim Cushing (my post here):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on techdirt: Appeals Court: ‘Plain View” Also Includes Using iPhone Camera Options To See Through Tinted Car Windows