Daily Archives: January 7, 2024

DC: Frisk of jacket in car was without RS

Defendant was a passenger in a rideshare, and the car was stopped for a traffic offense. They were all ordered out, and defendant took off his jacket while “blading,” said the officer, and left it in the car. The officer … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on DC: Frisk of jacket in car was without RS

NY3: Entry into def’s stairwell was apparently illegal, but officers knocked at the door at the top of the stairs and got consent; this was attenuated

Officers entered the stairwell up to defendant’s second floor apartment. It was contended that the entry was unreasonable because the stairwell was part of defendant’s tenancy. At the top of the stairs, however, officers knocked and gained consent to enter. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on NY3: Entry into def’s stairwell was apparently illegal, but officers knocked at the door at the top of the stairs and got consent; this was attenuated

CA2: Dog sniff of def’s car in driveway was done in GF reliance on law at time

Acting on a tip, officers did a dog sniff of defendant’s covered car parked in his driveway, and they used that to get a warrant for it. Collins didn’t come along until the following year. The officers laid it all … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA2: Dog sniff of def’s car in driveway was done in GF reliance on law at time

D.Minn.: SW arguably included use of cell site simulator to track phone; GFE applied in any event

The state issued warrant here authorized the use of a cell site simulator, but this wasn’t explicitly stated in the affidavit for warrant. And, the affidavit wasn’t incorporated into the warrant either. This is a close question. The court comes … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators, Custody, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: SW arguably included use of cell site simulator to track phone; GFE applied in any event

D.Minn.: Def’s PC suppression argument showed a trial defense, not an argment for suppression

Defendant’s objection to the R&R isn’t enough to overrule the USMJ’s finding there was probable cause. Defendant presents a trial defense, not a defense to probable cause. United States v. Cole, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 752 (D. Minn. Jan. 3, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def’s PC suppression argument showed a trial defense, not an argment for suppression