Daily Archives: August 26, 2023

TX5 upholds geofence warrant on PC and nexus, and then with GFE

The geofence warrant here satisfied the requirements of both probable cause and the good faith exception. There aren’t a lot of cases on geofence warrants, but those reaching the merits (and not just GFE) fully support the process here of … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX5 upholds geofence warrant on PC and nexus, and then with GFE

D.N.J.: Residual smell of MJ can still provide PC

“The Officers testified the smell of marijuana can remain in the area, or linger on clothing or other items, after marijuana is removed from the area, before or after it has been smoked. … It can also be difficult to … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Residual smell of MJ can still provide PC

OR: All electronic devices seized to be searched require PC showing

The affidavit for warrant did not show justification for search of all the electronic devices that were seized and then searched. State v. Cannon, 299 Ore. App. 616, 450 P.3d 567 (2019). (Probable cause was conceded as to some devices.) … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Curtilage, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: All electronic devices seized to be searched require PC showing

CA6: Standing required in a § 1983 case

Plaintiff didn’t have standing to raise someone else’s rights in a § 1983 case. Appeal dismissed. Jordan v. City of Toledo, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22063 (6th Cir. Aug. 21, 2023). Drug officers’ executing search warrants and stealing property was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Standing required in a § 1983 case

N.D.Ind.: No IAC where def pled but co-def prevailed on 4A claim

Defendant entered into a beneficial plea agreement and pled to a superseding information and was sentenced. Later, the passenger in his car filed a motion to suppress and prevailed. Still, this was not ineffective assistance of his counsel. “Aside from … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, DNA, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: No IAC where def pled but co-def prevailed on 4A claim