Daily Archives: August 8, 2023

CO granted review: Does IP address at one house permit a search of neighboring houses, too, if the signal reaches there?

Does IP address at one house permit a search of neighboring houses, too, if the signal reaches there? That’s not the question exactly, but close enough. Dhyne v. People, 2023 Colo. LEXIS 779 (Aug. 7, 2023)*:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CO granted review: Does IP address at one house permit a search of neighboring houses, too, if the signal reaches there?

M.D.Fla.: A records preservation request to cell phone providers was not a seizure

A records preservation letter sent to cell phone providers was not a seizure, let alone an unreasonable one. The records were later secured by search warrant. United States v. Zwiefelhofer, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134679 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: A records preservation request to cell phone providers was not a seizure

M.D.Tenn.: 4A unreasonable search clause may apply to excessive damaging search

In executing a search warrant unreasonably causing excessive and unnecessary property damage, the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment almost never applies, but the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable search clause may. Slaybaugh v. Rutherford Cty., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149105 (M.D. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: 4A unreasonable search clause may apply to excessive damaging search