Monthly Archives: August 2023

OR: All electronic devices seized to be searched require PC showing

The affidavit for warrant did not show justification for search of all the electronic devices that were seized and then searched. State v. Cannon, 299 Ore. App. 616, 450 P.3d 567 (2019). (Probable cause was conceded as to some devices.) … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Curtilage, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: All electronic devices seized to be searched require PC showing

CA6: Standing required in a § 1983 case

Plaintiff didn’t have standing to raise someone else’s rights in a § 1983 case. Appeal dismissed. Jordan v. City of Toledo, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22063 (6th Cir. Aug. 21, 2023). Drug officers’ executing search warrants and stealing property was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Standing required in a § 1983 case

N.D.Ind.: No IAC where def pled but co-def prevailed on 4A claim

Defendant entered into a beneficial plea agreement and pled to a superseding information and was sentenced. Later, the passenger in his car filed a motion to suppress and prevailed. Still, this was not ineffective assistance of his counsel. “Aside from … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, DNA, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: No IAC where def pled but co-def prevailed on 4A claim

CA7: PC can exist even if officer doesn’t believe “putative victim”

“But Garcia has a high hurdle to combat a probable-cause determination because G.C., the putative victim, identified him as responsible. … An officer need not even believe that a witness is reliable to determine that her statement supports probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: PC can exist even if officer doesn’t believe “putative victim”

Lawfare: Data Isn’t Property. It Doesn’t Have to Be.

Lawfare: Data Isn’t Property. It Doesn’t Have to Be. by Mailyn Fidler:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Lawfare: Data Isn’t Property. It Doesn’t Have to Be.

Forbes: Will The Judge Who Let Police Raid A Small Kansas Newspaper Be Held Accountable?

Forbes: Will The Judge Who Let Police Raid A Small Kansas Newspaper Be Held Accountable? by Andrew Wimer:

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on Forbes: Will The Judge Who Let Police Raid A Small Kansas Newspaper Be Held Accountable?

D.Ariz.: No REP in shared folder on computer open on eMule program

The government’s “pre-search” of a shared folder on defendant’s computer available through eMule was not subject to a reasonable expectation of privacy and was reasonable. United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146664 (D. Ariz. Aug. 21, 2023), adopting … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Computer and cloud searches, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No REP in shared folder on computer open on eMule program

Bloomberg Law: Church Sues California County Over Alleged Covid-19 Geofencing

Bloomberg Law: Church Sues California County Over Alleged Covid-19 Geofencing by Jorja Siemons:

Posted in geofence, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Church Sues California County Over Alleged Covid-19 Geofencing

N.D.Ohio: Passenger’s false info justified extending stop

“Based upon all of the above, the roughly 2 minutes and 23 seconds that Sergeant Perrin spent trying to determine why the passenger had given his false information was not an unreasonable extension of the duration of stop.” United States … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Passenger’s false info justified extending stop

OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

A “red screen” on the police car’s computer screen meant a serious warning about defendant’s LPN, and that justified the stop. State v. Cooper, 2023-Ohio-2897, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2881 (5th Dist. Aug. 18, 2023).* Blocking both ends of an … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

NYTimes: The Revealing Case of a Kansas Judge and a Search Warrant

NYTimes: The Revealing Case of a Kansas Judge and a Search Warrant by Gregory P. Magarian (“A government raid on a newspaper’s office and its publisher’s home, with police seizing reporters’ computers and phones, sounds like a lurid tale from … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NYTimes: The Revealing Case of a Kansas Judge and a Search Warrant

ND: Opening door of a parked and running semi when driver didn’t wake up was to gather information and was unreasonable

“Thus, we conclude law enforcement was acting outside the scope of the community caretaking function when opening the semi door and stepping onto the running boards in an attempt to gather information without first attempting to get a response from … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Curtilage, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on ND: Opening door of a parked and running semi when driver didn’t wake up was to gather information and was unreasonable

CA6: The fact a prior car search came up empty isn’t material for Franks

“Daniel has not demonstrated that the omission of the initial car search’s fruitlessness from the affidavit amounted to a deliberate falsehood or showed reckless disregard for the truth.” United States v. Daniel, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 21751 (6th Cir. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: The fact a prior car search came up empty isn’t material for Franks

FL2: Knock-and-announce not violated by “peaceably” entering through open door

“The record establishes that the doors to Mr. Wallin’s room were ‘completely wide open’ and the officers entered without force to execute a valid arrest warrant. The knock-and-announce requirement in section 901.19(1) did not apply based on the statute’s plain … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL2: Knock-and-announce not violated by “peaceably” entering through open door

NM: Passenger’s lie about age was RS to continue stop

The passenger’s admitted lie about his age was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. He wasn’t forthcoming in giving his age and first lied about it. It was permissible to ask the passenger about his identifiers. State v. Vasquez-Salas, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Passenger’s lie about age was RS to continue stop

CA8: Shot fired call from house resulted in protective sweep when door was answered by man matching description

Officers responding to a call about a shot fired from a window found a man answering the door matching the 911 description. A protective sweep was thus permissible. Defendant also consented to the entry. United States v. Williams, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Good faith exception, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA8: Shot fired call from house resulted in protective sweep when door was answered by man matching description

WaPo: 4A fourth most cited amendment

Department of Data, Washington Post: The Fourth Amendment (254,471) is the fourth most cited constitutional amendment in judicial opinions after the Fourteenth (501,271), Fifth (306,821), and Sixth (288,832) Amendments per LexisNexis. Judges have cited the Fourteenth Amendment half a million … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: 4A fourth most cited amendment

D.S.D. & OH5: When challenging another court’s SW, it has to be filed with the papers for the court to rule

Defendant challenges the tribal search warrant as lacking probable cause and being vindictively obtained, the latter of which does not exist under Rule 41. He fails to include the warrant papers so the court can’t rule. United States v. Floyd, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Excessive force, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.D. & OH5: When challenging another court’s SW, it has to be filed with the papers for the court to rule

OR: Third-party business records not to be treated the same as electronic records as in Carpenter

A third-party company’s records aren’t as detailed as electronic records (as in Carpenter), and they are not subject to the same standards for a warrant. State v. Hargrove, 327 Ore. App. 437 (Aug. 16, 2023) (at least not yet and … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Third-party business records not to be treated the same as electronic records as in Carpenter

D.Md.: Instagram SW was valid by GFE despite weak PC, but it was excessively searched

“The Instagram Motion [to suppress] will be granted in part. Although the probable cause to search Rivers’ Instagram account was weak, the Leon good faith exception applies and the evidence will therefore not be suppressed on the basis of a … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Excessive force, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Md.: Instagram SW was valid by GFE despite weak PC, but it was excessively searched