Monthly Archives: June 2023

D.Mont.: § 1983 that Montana SWs can’t be executed on tribal lands barred by Younger

Plaintiff in Lewis & Clark County Jail sues under § 1983 that Montana search warrants can’t be executed on tribal lands. This claim is barred by Younger. Adams v. Baker, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107569 (D. Mont. June 21, 2023).* … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mont.: § 1983 that Montana SWs can’t be executed on tribal lands barred by Younger

OH1: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations

The exclusionary rule applies only to constitutional violations, not statutory, and a violation of the probation search statute is not subject to exclusion. State v. Borger, 2023-Ohio-2025, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2044 (1st Dist. June 21, 2023). “While we note … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations

RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

Despite Carpenter saying it is limited to historical CSLI, this court concludes there is no meaningful difference between real-time and historical CSLI under Carpenter. Exigency, however, was real. The police were in hot pursuit seeking to question defendant for a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

PA: Justified inquiry about presence of a firearm didn’t unreasonably extend stop

It was reasonable during defendant’s traffic stop for the officer to inquire into whether he had a firearm because the officer figured out defendant was a security guard likely with a weapon. That did not unreasonably extend the stop. Commonwealth … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on PA: Justified inquiry about presence of a firearm didn’t unreasonably extend stop

CA5: No preliminary injunction for copying attorney cell phone at border

An immigration attorney who claimed the government copied his cell phone four times after he returned from other countries wasn’t entitled to a preliminary injunction. “Government retention of unlawfully seized property is not sufficient, standing alone, to establish irreparable injury.” … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA5: No preliminary injunction for copying attorney cell phone at border

The Intercept: LexisNexis Is Selling Your Personal Data to ICE So It Can Try to Predict Crimes

The Intercept: LexisNexis Is Selling Your Personal Data to ICE So It Can Try to Predict Crimes by Sam Biddle (“ICE uses LexisNexis to track cars, gather information on people, and make arrests for its deportation machine, according to a … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: LexisNexis Is Selling Your Personal Data to ICE So It Can Try to Predict Crimes

CA5: Only RS needed for a routine manual border search of a cell phone

The Fifth Circuit follows other circuits to require only reasonable suspicion for a routine manual border cell phone search. Having found child pornography, the government could keep looking. “He argues that the government violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Border search, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Only RS needed for a routine manual border search of a cell phone

NE: Cell phone tower dump 15 min. before and after a shooting was reasonable

A cell phone tower dump for 15 minutes before and after a shooting was reasonable. It did not implicate the “privacies of life” that would be with CSLI for an extended period of time, as in Carpenter. State v. Elias, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on NE: Cell phone tower dump 15 min. before and after a shooting was reasonable

E.D.Tex.: No right to ex ante notice of email SW to challenge it before execution; remedy is after

An email account holder does not have a right to notice before execution of an email warrant. Moreover, he or she has no standing to challenge a search warrant for email before the warrant is executed. In re Search of … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: No right to ex ante notice of email SW to challenge it before execution; remedy is after

NY Bronx: SW for arrest bystander’s cell phone denied

NYPD got a search warrant for a cell phone that a citizen used to record an arrest. The further search warrant to search the phone is denied. They would have to download the entire phone and then search that, and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones | Comments Off on NY Bronx: SW for arrest bystander’s cell phone denied

CA1: Vertical collective knowledge applied; horizontal doesn’t have to be decided

Vertical collective knowledge clearly applies where an officer directed another to make a stop. Therefore, the bounds of horizontal collective knowledge doesn’t matter here. United States v. Balser, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 15060 (1st Cir. June 16, 2023) (a good … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: Vertical collective knowledge applied; horizontal doesn’t have to be decided

D.Idaho: With PC to arrest, use of CSLI to locate ptf did not violate 4A

Probable cause existed for plaintiff’s arrest for eluding officers before his GPS location sharing was utilized to find him. And, state law and rules have no bearing on the federal claim. Larrea v. Koreis, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104699 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell site location information, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Idaho: With PC to arrest, use of CSLI to locate ptf did not violate 4A

CA8: No need to prove exigency under 4A for automobile exception

No matter what state cases under state law may say, there’s no need to prove exigency in an automobile exception case under the Fourth Amendment, even when the car is temporarily immobilized. United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: No need to prove exigency under 4A for automobile exception

CA7: The remedy for an overbroad SW is a motion to suppress, not a motion to dismiss

An alleged overbroad email search warrant is pursued by a motion to suppress, not a motion to dismiss. “The remedy for such Fourth Amendment violations in a criminal proceeding is suppression of the evidence, not dismissal of the indictment or … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Exclusionary rule, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA7: The remedy for an overbroad SW is a motion to suppress, not a motion to dismiss

KY: The conditions of parole factor into reasonableness of a parole search

Defendant did not properly preserve his state constitutional claim that warrantless parole searches should be more protective of a suspect’s rights than the Fourth Amendment. On the Fourth Amendment claim, the search complied with Samson and Knights. The conditions of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, DNA, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: The conditions of parole factor into reasonableness of a parole search

W.D.Mich.: Differing possessory interest claims in state and then federal court is estoppel

At a state show cause hearing, plaintiff disavowed any possessory or property interest in two pit bulls, so he’s estopped from claiming it in a § 1983 case over the dogs. Crandall v. Newaygo Cty., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104374 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Differing possessory interest claims in state and then federal court is estoppel

E.D.Tenn.: Undated controlled buys had to be in five weeks before SW, and that’s not stale

The multiple controlled buys were undated in the search warrant application, but the common sense reading was that they were in the five weeks before the warrant issued. That shows an ongoing drug operation, and it’s not stale. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Undated controlled buys had to be in five weeks before SW, and that’s not stale

IL grants access to cell phone passcode because biometric scan obviates act of production doctrine

After finding jurisdiction because denying the state access to a cell phone by its forcing the revealing of its passcode was effectively suppressing the search warrant, the Illinois Supreme Court holds that the act of production doctrine of the Fifth … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on IL grants access to cell phone passcode because biometric scan obviates act of production doctrine

FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

Defendant sought unsealing of the search warrant affidavit which the state successfully resisted on the ground of informant privilege in other ongoing investigations. The defense never sought in camera review. Without that, the issue was unpreserved for appellate review. Leverette … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, State constitution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

CA8: No REP against CI recording you in your own house

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy against video recording by an informant when the informant was invited into the home. United States v. May, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 14734 (8th Cir. June 14, 2023). “Upon review, the Court finds … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA8: No REP against CI recording you in your own house