Monthly Archives: June 2023

MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

Virginia v. Moore does not require that an arresting officer personally have seen the act that led to the arrest outside the officer’s jurisdiction as long as there was probable cause. State v. Barton, 2023 Mo. LEXIS 183 (June 27, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

TX: Def had no REP in work truck searched by owner at police request three days after his arrest and expiration of SW

Recognizing that Byrd holds that a person can have standing in a vehicle owned and maybe even operated by another: “Does an employee retain standing to contest a search or seizure in his work vehicle several days after he was … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX: Def had no REP in work truck searched by owner at police request three days after his arrest and expiration of SW

D.Vt.: Hiding a fanny pack in a trash can from the police was abandonment without evidence of intent to recover it

Defendant put a fanny pack in a trash can when the police were around. Without evidence he intended to retrieve it, it is treated as abandoned property that he has no standing in. United States v. Moffitt, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Hiding a fanny pack in a trash can from the police was abandonment without evidence of intent to recover it

CA7: Claim of excessive force in arrest by federal agent does not state new type of Bivens claim

A claim of excessive force during an arrest by a federal agent does not state a new type of Bivens claim, and it can proceed. Snowden v. Henning, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 16221 (7th Cir. June 27, 2023). (This was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Custody, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA7: Claim of excessive force in arrest by federal agent does not state new type of Bivens claim

GA: Refusal to consent to taking a DNA swab in a rape investigation is admissible at trial

Defendant’s refusal to consent to taking a DNA swab in a rape investigation is admissible at trial. Post-arrest cheek swabs do not violate the Fourth Amendment because they are accepted police booking and jailing procedures, similar to fingerprinting and photographing. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Refusal to consent to taking a DNA swab in a rape investigation is admissible at trial

MO: When a backpack is abandoned, that includes the sealed packages inside it

When defendant’s backpack was abandoned, that included sealed packages inside it. State v. Fernandez, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 461 (June 27, 2023). “Nonetheless, the Durham Court’s general statement, that having a roommate does not convert a single-family house into a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MO: When a backpack is abandoned, that includes the sealed packages inside it

NM: SW for bodily standards in case pending for trial not 4A or due process violation

After defendant was indicted a search warrant for bodily standards was sought from the metropolitan court. It didn’t lose jurisdiction for a search warrant, even in a case pending in a “higher” trial court. “[P]ost-indictment warrants are lawful in New … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NM: SW for bodily standards in case pending for trial not 4A or due process violation

CA6: Opening car door without warning exceeded community caretaking function

The police community caretaking function has a long and important history that goes back nearly 800 years. But, seeing defendant parked in the snow with the engine running and apparently asleep, opening his car door to check on him was … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Opening car door without warning exceeded community caretaking function

CA11: Inmate email has same 1A protection snail mail does

Prison email to family members is protected by the First Amendment. “Just as the Fourth Amendment protects against searches by technology unknown in the 18th century, see Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27, 34-38 (2001), the First Amendment protects … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, E-mail, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA11: Inmate email has same 1A protection snail mail does

CA4: Search of unlocked van with door ajar left overnight on bank parking lot with visible assault rifle was reasonable under community caretaking function

A bank employee saw a van parked on the bank’s lot that had been there overnight. Officers responded and saw an assault rifle in the passenger compartment. “Around 12:30 [p.m.], without knocking or announcing their presence, Lambert and Wagner pulled … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Search of unlocked van with door ajar left overnight on bank parking lot with visible assault rifle was reasonable under community caretaking function

W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

Law enforcement officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target. “However, in reviewing a search warrant for probable cause, a court is ‘to look holistically at what the affidavit does show, instead … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

CA11: Magistrate who came to the scene to sign SW was still neutral and detached

The issuing magistrate was still neutral and detached. He came to the location of the search to assist in getting the warrant issued, but he stayed away from the building and signed the paperwork. He did not get involved or … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on CA11: Magistrate who came to the scene to sign SW was still neutral and detached

NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

Where the officer smelled marijuana in the passenger compartment and searched for it finding nothing, a search of the engine compartment and trunk was excessive under the automobile exception. From the syllabus : “Expanding the search to the engine compartment … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

Failure to file the warrant return doesn’t require suppression. It’s a curable ministerial act. Besides, the defendant can’t show prejudice. As to the merits, the search warrant was issued with probable cause and the good faith exception applies in any … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

C.D.Cal.: Defense counsel can’t make a false argument belied by evidence the govt. agreed to suppress

Defense counsel’s closing argument that was flatly contradicted by evidence the government elected to not put in in response to a motion to suppress maybe could have come in. Defense counsel can’t make a false argument to the jury without … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Defense counsel can’t make a false argument belied by evidence the govt. agreed to suppress

M.D.Ala.: Address alone isn’t enough to confer standing in a mailed package; name on it has to be yours

Defendant wasn’t shown as an addressee of this package, but it was sent to his address. That alone doesn’t give him standing. United States v. Roberts, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107828 (M.D. Ala. May 18, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Address alone isn’t enough to confer standing in a mailed package; name on it has to be yours

IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

“In contrast, here the State established that Maverick was a certified drug sniffing dog with a history of reliability. Maverick’s behavior, even without a full final response of sitting, was sufficient to indicate that he had detected the odors of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

MI: Terry justified this search and seizure, not plain feel

The court of appeals erred in not applying Terry to this frisk inside defendant’s coat, instead relying on plain feel. Remanded. People v. Turner, 2023 Mich. LEXIS 937 (June 21, 2023). “Here, the warrant specifically identified the offenses for which … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Terry justified this search and seizure, not plain feel

DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

The search warrant might appear general, but it was limited by the things to be searched for. The reference to “trace evidence including but not limited to blood, hair, fibers, fluids, and fingerprints” did not make it unparticular. Trace evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

Bloomberg: Abortion Fears Spur Reverse Search Warrant Bill in California

Bloomberg: Abortion Fears Spur Reverse Search Warrant Bill in California by Titus Wu (“Privacy advocates are pushing California to be the first to crack down on a controversial investigative tool used by police that compels technology companies to turn over … Continue reading

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Abortion Fears Spur Reverse Search Warrant Bill in California