Monthly Archives: September 2022

GA: Officers with an arrest warrant can enter the backyard, too

Officers with an arrest warrant for defendant at his place were permitted to enter the backyard too, where evidence was seen and seized. Jones v. State, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 256 (Sep. 20, 2022). Not mentioning in the affidavit for search … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Officers with an arrest warrant can enter the backyard, too

S.D.N.Y.: Two years to search a password protected computer, and more after mistrial, was not unreasonable

The government got a search warrant for defendant’s computer in days, but it took two years to complete the forensic review because of password protection. The two-year delay was thus not unreasonable. After a mistrial, the government kept searching, and … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Two years to search a password protected computer, and more after mistrial, was not unreasonable

MA: Def not prejudiced by third party’s response to SW

A third party in possession of Medicaid records was served with a search warrant, and appellant complains of the procedural nature of the third party’s response. [Aside from no standing,] Appellant doesn’t even attempt to show that the exclusionary rule … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Exclusionary rule, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MA: Def not prejudiced by third party’s response to SW

E.D.Pa.: On scene seizure for a show-up was reasonable

Defendant’s seizure hiding behind a motorcycle for a victim’s ID to determine whether he was involved in a car jacking was reasonable. United States v. Dangerfield-Hill, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168306 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2022). District court’s injunction against … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, National security, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: On scene seizure for a show-up was reasonable

IL: Smell of burnt MJ in a car in a recreational use state not PC

“We hold that the smell of the burnt cannabis, without any corroborating factors, is not enough to establish probable cause to search the vehicle, and the court did not err in granting the motion to suppress. This finding comports with … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: Smell of burnt MJ in a car in a recreational use state not PC

E.D.Pa.: Searching administratively impounded taxi states 4A claim

Plaintiff states a claim against the Philadelphia Parking Authority for detaining his temporarily impounded taxi for a later search without justification. Mbagwu v. PPA Taxi & Limousine Div., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167790 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2022). A cross-sex … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Searching administratively impounded taxi states 4A claim

The Crime Report: San Francisco PD Wants Access to Private Surveillance Cameras

The Crime Report: San Francisco PD Wants Access to Private Surveillance Cameras (“The San Francisco Board of Supervisors is considering a consequential vote on a proposal from the San Francisco police department that seeks a boost in law enforcement access … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Crime Report: San Francisco PD Wants Access to Private Surveillance Cameras

MI: Even if using a drone to take pictures in zoning dispute violated 4A, exclusionary rule does not apply, and the action below was remedial not punitive

The use of a drone to take pictures by a city contractor in case over a zoning ordinance violation probably did not violate any Fourth Amendment right. But even if it did, the exclusionary rule should not apply in this … Continue reading

Posted in Drones, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MI: Even if using a drone to take pictures in zoning dispute violated 4A, exclusionary rule does not apply, and the action below was remedial not punitive

techdirt: Device Searches Have Created A Massive Database Of American Phone Data CBP Agents Can Search At Will

techdirt: Device Searches Have Created A Massive Database Of American Phone Data CBP Agents Can Search At Will by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on techdirt: Device Searches Have Created A Massive Database Of American Phone Data CBP Agents Can Search At Will

MA: GPS monitoring for probation for a sex offense didn’t serve the stated purpose and was unreasonable

Defendant was on probation for a sex offense, and the trial court ordered he wear a GPS monitor for three years as a method of enforcing an “exclusion zone” for the victim’s sake. However, the victim’s location was unknown, so … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on MA: GPS monitoring for probation for a sex offense didn’t serve the stated purpose and was unreasonable

D.Ariz.: Following for 30 miles not a seizure

Following defendant for 30 miles is not a seizure. Finally, there was a consensual encounter. The R&R found it not; the USDJ disagrees. United States v. Ramos, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166913 (D. Ariz. Sep. 14, 2022).* 2½ months isn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Following for 30 miles not a seizure

TN: No IAC: strategic choice to distance def from premises

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the search of the premises. The defense at trial was that defendant was merely a guest who didn’t have control of the stuff found there. To link defendant more to the premises was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on TN: No IAC: strategic choice to distance def from premises

Cal.4th: SW papers for cell site simulators remain under seal because CIs are identified in there

EFF sued for access to search warrant materials that led to use of cell site simulators. The court finds that the protection of named CIs in the papers still needs to be protected, and they remain under seal. Electronic Frontier … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators, Franks doctrine, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on Cal.4th: SW papers for cell site simulators remain under seal because CIs are identified in there

ID & CA3: Two views same day on misdemeanor arrests

Defendant was already stopped and the officer suspected DUI. She was handcuffed and transported for a breath test. This was an arrest for a misdemeanor that did not happen in the officer’s presence, and it thus violated the state constitution. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on ID & CA3: Two views same day on misdemeanor arrests

E.D.N.Y.: Rental car GPS data not comparable to CSLI; it’s just third-party information

Rental car location tracking is significantly different from CSLI. It is purely third-party information. Moreover, the rental car company consented to the taking of the information. United States v. Brown, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166119 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2022). The … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Rental car GPS data not comparable to CSLI; it’s just third-party information

MD: Appointment of state trial judges not 4A violation; they have statewide jurisdiction for SWs

Maryland trial judges have statewide jurisdiction for search warrants. Thus, the assignment of judges in Baltimore by the Chief Judge of the state high court violated nothing under the Fourth Amendment. (Without citing Virginia v. Moore. And, even if it … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MD: Appointment of state trial judges not 4A violation; they have statewide jurisdiction for SWs

WaPo: Customs officials have copied Americans’ phone data at massive scale

WaPo: Customs officials have copied Americans’ phone data at massive scale by Drew Harwell (“Contacts, call logs, messages and photos from up to 10,000 travelers’ phones are saved to a government database every year.”)https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/15/government-surveillance-database-dhs/ And weren’t we told when this … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: Customs officials have copied Americans’ phone data at massive scale

CA11: Cell phone search mistakenly without a warrant still saved by GFE

Defendant was convicted of Hobbs Act robbery, and his cell phone was used against him after it was left in the borrowed getaway car. The cell phone was searched mistakenly without a warrant. When the officer discovered he forgot a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA11: Cell phone search mistakenly without a warrant still saved by GFE

D.C.Cir.: Question of fact remains on whether PC dissipated before second handcuffing

“We reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the false arrest claims for two reasons. First, there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether probable cause for the simple assault charge dissipated before Lin was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Question of fact remains on whether PC dissipated before second handcuffing

S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless seizure of a vehicle to pay fines violates 4A and 14A

The warrantless seizure of a vehicle because of owed fines violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v. City of Yonkers, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164416 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 12, 2022). Pretrial detainees also have no reasonable expectation … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless seizure of a vehicle to pay fines violates 4A and 14A