Monthly Archives: April 2022

N.D.Ill.: Going to drug deal from house and then going back is nexus to the house

Defendant left his house, went to a drug deal, and returned. This is not the officer’s mere reliance on what drug dealers normally do or he would expect to find. United States v. McCreary, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69838 (N.D.Ill. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Inventory, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Going to drug deal from house and then going back is nexus to the house

CA8: Court can consider GFE rather than decide PC

“‘[T]his Court ‘may consider the applicability of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule,’ without addressing whether probable cause exists.” Here, there was enough to likely show probable cause so the officer reasonably believed in the validity of the warrant. … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8: Court can consider GFE rather than decide PC

E.D.Mo.: No blanket rule passengers can be asked pedigree questions during traffic stop

There is no blanket rule that passengers in a traffic stop can be asked their pedigree information. The cases the government rely on are pre-Rodriguez and of no real value. Here, those questions extended the stop. United States v. Wright, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No blanket rule passengers can be asked pedigree questions during traffic stop

CA11: QI for officers sued in Florida spa video surveillance case

Plaintiff’s § 1983 case over the video surveillance in the East Sea Spa case (see here) fails on qualified immunity for lack of clearly established law. Thompson v. Indian River County Sheriff’s Office, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 10266 (11th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: QI for officers sued in Florida spa video surveillance case

E.D.Tenn.: USDJ doesn’t second guess USMJ’s credibility determinations in the R&R

USDJ doesn’t second guess USMJ’s credibility determinations in the R&R on a motion to suppress. United States v. Bowman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69156 (E.D.Tenn. Apr. 14, 2022).* A bag left outdoors at an apartment complex for more than a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Custody, Seizure, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: USDJ doesn’t second guess USMJ’s credibility determinations in the R&R

Kansas Reflector: Kansas law enforcement routinely produces error-filled reports on seized cash and property

Kansas Reflector (via Rawstory): Kansas law enforcement routinely produces error-filled reports on seized cash and property by Duane Schrag:

Posted in Forfeiture, Seizure | Comments Off on Kansas Reflector: Kansas law enforcement routinely produces error-filled reports on seized cash and property

E.D.Ark.: City’s court order made clean up and removal of ptf’s property reasonable

Plaintiff was told for years to clean up his property from unsightly construction materials and equipment. After many failed efforts to get him to do so, the city obtained a court order to remove the property. It removed nine trailerloads … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: City’s court order made clean up and removal of ptf’s property reasonable

Cal.1: Being “under investigation” for something else and then being in a “high crime area” is not RS

Being “under investigation” for some crime and then being seen in a “high crime area” is not reasonable suspicion. “And ‘a person’s Fourth Amendment rights cannot be lessened simply because he or she is “under investigation” by the police. Just … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.1: Being “under investigation” for something else and then being in a “high crime area” is not RS

E.D.Mo.: Empty sandwich bag in car not subject to plain view; incriminating nature not immediately apparent

The government failed to establish reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop on an anonymous tip where nothing of substance was furnished contrary to Navarette. Moreover, it wasn’t immediately apparent an empty sandwich bag in the car was incriminating for plain view. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Empty sandwich bag in car not subject to plain view; incriminating nature not immediately apparent

OR: A metal box next to def when stopped was subject to search incident here

Even under Oregon’s restrictive search incident doctrine, the search of a metal box next to defendant was reasonable. She was suspected of stealing from a Salvation Army donations trailer when she was stopped. Practically anything in her vehicle looked like … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: A metal box next to def when stopped was subject to search incident here

Three on Franks

This Franks argument fails. “Here, there is no indication that any false statement was intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, included in the affidavit. Even assuming the information provided by the CI was false or misleading, there is … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Three on Franks

MT: Magistrate’s jurisdiction for SW is over place it could be found, not crime

The geographic limitation on magistrates issuing search warrants applies to the location of the evidence sought, not the location of the crime. State v. Grussing, 2022 MT 76, 2022 Mont. LEXIS 319 (Apr. 12, 2022). The telecommunication records here could … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MT: Magistrate’s jurisdiction for SW is over place it could be found, not crime

CA3: Police created exigency during stop not justification to extend it

Police can detour from the mission of a traffic stop to investigate other crimes just because the stop is in a high crime area, but they can’t use that to create exigency that doesn’t exist as to this defendant. United … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Police created exigency during stop not justification to extend it

CA10: Def’s actions were completely consistent with innocence and did not add up to RS

The officer did not have reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop or its continuation. Defendant’s actions were consistent with somebody who had nothing to hide, and the district court’s findings got no presumption of correctness. Denial of the suppression motion reversed. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s actions were completely consistent with innocence and did not add up to RS

WaPo: No-knock raids have led to fatal encounters and small drug seizures

WaPo: No-knock raids have led to fatal encounters and small drug seizures by Nicole Dungca and Jenn Abelson WaPo: What to know about no-knock warrants by Courtney Kan (“Amir Locke and Breonna Taylor were killed while police executed no-knock warrants. … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on WaPo: No-knock raids have led to fatal encounters and small drug seizures

NPR: WNYC: The Takeaway: How Crime, Technology, and Civil Liberties Collide Through Geofence Warrants

NPR: WNYC: The Takeaway: How Crime, Technology, and Civil Liberties Collide Through Geofence Warrants (“Last month, a federal judge in Richmond, Virginia ruled that the use of a geofence warrant to make an arrest in a robbery case was unconstitutional … Continue reading

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on NPR: WNYC: The Takeaway: How Crime, Technology, and Civil Liberties Collide Through Geofence Warrants

CNS: St. Louis County defends wanted alert system at Eighth Circuit

CNS: St. Louis County defends wanted alert system at Eighth Circuit (“The system allows police officers to issue alerts for suspects based on their own probable cause without having a judge sign off on a warrant.”)

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CNS: St. Louis County defends wanted alert system at Eighth Circuit

NM: Motion to suppress checkpoint stop too general to put state on notice

“We conclude Defendant’s motion was insufficiently particular to alert the metropolitan court or State that the grounds for suppressing evidence related to the checkpoint’s illegality.” “Defendant’s motion, rather, was based upon the State lacking reasonable suspicion to detain Defendant. The … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Chekpoints, Private search, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on NM: Motion to suppress checkpoint stop too general to put state on notice

OH: Material witness warrant requires PC

“Based on the language in the [Fourth Amendment] and Ohio Constitutions, we now hold that material witnesses are entitled to these basic, fundamental rights and therefore agree with the Eighth District that the state’s request for a warrant to detain … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH: Material witness warrant requires PC

Officers engage in small talk to see if RS develops

“The Court finds this stop was constitutional. There was reasonable suspicion that justified the prolonged detention. The arresting officer, Texas Department of Public Safety State Trooper John Loftin, developed reasonable suspicion during the course of the stop. The driver of … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Officers engage in small talk to see if RS develops