Monthly Archives: March 2022

Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver

Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver (“Jury finds First, Fourth amendment violations of protesters by police”)

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver

NM: Social media platforms reporting to NCMEC are reliable informants

Social media providers sent suspected child pornography to NCMEC, and they were reliable informants. “The State appeals the district court’s grant of Defendant James Henz’s motion to suppress child pornography found in the search of his home, arguing that the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NM: Social media platforms reporting to NCMEC are reliable informants

OR: Asking juror question about refusal of consent was error, but here harmless

Oregon permits juror questions, and here one asked whether defendant willingly provided a DNA sample. Asking it on the record all amounted to error, but under plain error review, with other evidence in the case, it’s not reversible. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Asking juror question about refusal of consent was error, but here harmless

E.D.Tenn.: Def doesn’t show a right to see whether the SW in his case was validly issued; that’s the lawyer’s call; and he pled guilty

“Petitioner alleges that Attorney Greene failed to present critical documents for Petitioner’s review prior to his guilty plea. Petitioner contends that he should have been shown ‘evidence of there being a valid search warrant,’ ‘computer chat logs where the government … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def doesn’t show a right to see whether the SW in his case was validly issued; that’s the lawyer’s call; and he pled guilty

OR: Questions unrelated to stop unreasonably extended it

“At the outset of the stop, West asked defendant a series of questions: (1) ‘Do you live in this area?’; (2) ‘What are you doing up here?’; (3) ‘Where are you coming from today?’; and (4) if West could see … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Questions unrelated to stop unreasonably extended it

CA2: Swearing to arrest warrant at direction of a prosecutor does not confer prosecutorial immunity

“Long-standing precedent makes clear that swearing to an arrest warrant affidavit and executing an arrest are traditional police functions, and performing such functions at the direction of a prosecutor does not transform them into prosecutorial acts protected by absolute immunity.” … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Independent source, Ineffective assistance, Privileges | Comments Off on CA2: Swearing to arrest warrant at direction of a prosecutor does not confer prosecutorial immunity

D.Mass.: The drug/currency courier profile is back

United States v. $48,940 in United States Currency, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51246 (D.Mass. Mar. 22, 2022):

Posted in Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mass.: The drug/currency courier profile is back

PA: Warrantless entry to arrest for DUI here was unreasonable; no exigency

A warrantless entry into defendant’s house because he’d been driving drunk was unreasonable. “Considering all the foregoing, we do not believe the Roland factors weigh in favor of an exigency here. Police were investigating a suspected drunk driver and nothing … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on PA: Warrantless entry to arrest for DUI here was unreasonable; no exigency

E.D.Wis.: Inevitable discovery cures otherwise unreasonable inventory

“The search here was generally unreasonable, but it was saved by inevitable discovery. “In the present case, the Government does not contend that Hobbs had probable cause to search Defendant’s vehicle. Hobbs did not have a warrant. His search was … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Inevitable discovery cures otherwise unreasonable inventory

NY: No-knock warrant execution creates “special duty” for NY negligence law

For purposes of NY negligence law, execution of a no-knock warrant creates a “special duty” between the police and the public. Ferreira v. City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, 2022 N.Y. LEXIS 392 (Mar. 22, 2022):

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on NY: No-knock warrant execution creates “special duty” for NY negligence law

D.Guam: Issuing magistrate’s later recusal for knowing target’s dad doesn’t show he wasn’t neutral and detached

After search warrant was issued, the issuing magistrate recused from the rest of the matter because defendant’s father was a longstanding employee of the court. There apparently was no relationship with defendant. This did not present a constitutional problem for … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Guam: Issuing magistrate’s later recusal for knowing target’s dad doesn’t show he wasn’t neutral and detached

D.Nev.: Traffic stop devolving into investigation of violation of parole conditions was without RS

“The Court finds that Chronister unlawfully prolonged the traffic stop by pursuing an investigation into whether or not Lewis was in violation of his parole conditions.” “The Court finds that Chronister did not believe at the time of the traffic … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Traffic stop devolving into investigation of violation of parole conditions was without RS

E.D.Wash.: Tribal membership confers no standing; Art. III standing isn’t 4A standing

Tribal membership confers no standing. “Article III standing is not Fourth Amendment standing, and Defendants’ argument that the Confederated Tribes [and Bands of Yakima Nation v. Yakima County, 963 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2020)] decision, by negative implication, means that … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Tribal membership confers no standing; Art. III standing isn’t 4A standing

Not being candid about the SW or affidavit in the motion to suppress isn’t good for the defense

“Moreover, even if Defendant is correct that SAPD lacked probable cause to search his vehicle, a motion to suppress is unlikely to succeed. Defendant focuses on one paragraph of the search warrant affidavits and ignores the other four paragraphs detailing … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on Not being candid about the SW or affidavit in the motion to suppress isn’t good for the defense

CA8: SW not needed for parked car just driven there

A dog alert on a parked Yukon did not require a search warrant before the search. It was parked on the property of a storage facility, and it was just driven to that spot while officers were getting a warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on CA8: SW not needed for parked car just driven there

WaPo: Cellphone dragnets can help catch criminals. Judges say they can also violate constitutional rights.

WaPo: Cellphone dragnets can help catch criminals. Judges say they can also violate constitutional rights. By Justin Jouvenal & Rachel Weiner (“Police requests for ‘geofence’ data showing active cellphones near crime scenes have skyrocketed.”)

Posted in Cell phones, geofence | Comments Off on WaPo: Cellphone dragnets can help catch criminals. Judges say they can also violate constitutional rights.

D.D.C.: No RS for sniff of luggage carried by Amtrak passenger

On the whole, there wasn’t reasonable suspicion for the dog sniff of the luggage they were carrying. Moreover, the court does not find they consented to it. The court declines to credit the testimony of the officer about nervousness and … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Mail and packages, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: No RS for sniff of luggage carried by Amtrak passenger

CA9: Two on QI: pepper spraying and Tasering

Officer denied qualified immunity for pepper-spraying a non-violent protester in the face. “In sum, every reasonable officer had notice at the time of the incident that, if reasonable alternatives are available, even in somewhat chaotic circumstances, he or she cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Two on QI: pepper spraying and Tasering

IA: Boilerplate language alone in an affidavit for SW does not establish nexus

Boilerplate language alone in an affidavit for warrant does not establish nexus. State v. Bracy, 2022 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 29 (Mar. 18, 2022) (citing § 6.14 of Treatise (§ 3:13 of 3d ed.). Omitting a CI’s criminal history from the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Boilerplate language alone in an affidavit for SW does not establish nexus

NY Co.: SW for cell phone without time limitation was unreasonable

One search warrant for searching defendant’s phone with Cellebrite was without time limitation and was overbroad. People v. Gonzalez, 2022 NY Slip Op 22074, 2022 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 928 (N.Y.Co. Mar. 7, 2022). Defendant claimed his jail calls after 48 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on NY Co.: SW for cell phone without time limitation was unreasonable