Daily Archives: January 11, 2022

S.D.Cal. gives helpful explanation of application of Heck bar

A helpful explanation of the Heck bar to Fourth Amendment claims is Cordova v. Imperial Cnty. Narcotics Task Force, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3993 (S.D.Cal. Jan. 7, 2022).* Plaintiff lost her excessive force claim, and the defendants sought attorneys fees … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal. gives helpful explanation of application of Heck bar

D.Neb.: Inventory reasonable and followed SOP despite officer’s expectation to find evidence of crime

The inventory here was reasonable despite the fact the officer suspected illegal items in the vehicle. A criminal search was not the sole motivating factor, and the inventory followed SOPs. United States v. Nielsen, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 249611 (D.Neb. … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Inventory reasonable and followed SOP despite officer’s expectation to find evidence of crime

D.Conn.: Arrest warrant permitted entry into def’s house to attempt to locate him

Defendant was on the lam, and officers, armed with an arrest warrant, entered his house thinking he’d returned there. He wasn’t but observations were made that led to a search warrant for the house. Motion to suppress denied. The arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Arrest warrant permitted entry into def’s house to attempt to locate him

E.D.Mo.: Third party to forfeiture can’t challenge search

Third parties to a forfeiture seeking to protect their interest have no standing to challenge legality of the seizure that led to the forfeiture. United States v. Koeln, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3934 (E.D.Mo. Jan. 10, 2022). Defendant’s felony arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Forfeiture, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Third party to forfeiture can’t challenge search

CO: Particularity of cell phone SW was harmless error and didn’t even have to be decided

Defendant’s claim that his cell phone search warrant violated the particularity requirement does not have to be decided because, if error, it is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt on this record. Pettigrew v. People, 2022 CO 2, 2022 Colo. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CO: Particularity of cell phone SW was harmless error and didn’t even have to be decided

CA4: Unsigned SW was subject to GFE where it was readily apparent it was read and acted on

A state unsigned warrant was subject to the good faith exception where the issuing magistrate did everything but sign. The magistrate signed the application on the back of the state-mandated form and initialed the warrant. The court doesn’t go so … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Unsigned SW was subject to GFE where it was readily apparent it was read and acted on

Cal.2: Firing of two LAPD police officers recorded in patrol car ignoring a robbery in progress upheld

Not a search and seizure case, but interesting, and compare this to arrestees recorded talking to each other or themselves in the back of a police car where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy: The firing of two LAPD … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Cal.2: Firing of two LAPD police officers recorded in patrol car ignoring a robbery in progress upheld