Daily Archives: January 2, 2022

D.D.C.: Being “wide eyed” and evading police when seeing them isn’t RS

Defendant getting wide eyed on seeing police and then hiding from them understandably would get their attention, but it’s not reasonable suspicion. United States v. Winecoff, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 248279 (D.D.C. Dec. 30, 2021):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Being “wide eyed” and evading police when seeing them isn’t RS

D.N.M.: Def in a make of car he was prone to steal one hour after its theft was RS

The officer had reasonable suspicion on the totality to detain defendant for car theft. Defendant had a general reputation for that in the community. United States v. Madrigal, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247007 (D.N.M. Dec. 28, 2021)* [one of those … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def in a make of car he was prone to steal one hour after its theft was RS

CA5: NCMEC not public actor, but its search didn’t exceed private search

NCMEC is not a government actor for Fourth Amendment purposes. Even if it was, its search did not exceed that of the private searcher that forwarded the information to it. “Because Meals has not carried his burden concerning NCMEC’s participation … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: NCMEC not public actor, but its search didn’t exceed private search

N.D.Ohio: Def’s psychotherapist reported he was viewing CP; 4A does not prohibit using it in SW application

The psychotherapist-patient privilege does not bar use of a report from defendant’s psychotherapist to law enforcement that defendant admitted viewing child pornography. The psychotherapist discussed with others and concluded that a report was necessary. Whatever the privilege for trial, it … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s psychotherapist reported he was viewing CP; 4A does not prohibit using it in SW application

N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

A defendant can’t use a 2241 habeas as a way to appeal denial of a motion to suppress by another district judge. Butler v. Cook, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247876 (N.D.Fla. Nov. 30, 2021). Controlled buys from defendant a few … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

D.Neb.: “Defendant’s own characteristics show his consent was voluntary.”

“Defendant’s own characteristics show his consent was voluntary. Defendant was an adult and conversed easily with officers prior to the search. He appeared to be at least of average intelligence. Defendant’s answers to the officer’s questions and his overall demeanor … Continue reading

Posted in Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Neb.: “Defendant’s own characteristics show his consent was voluntary.”