Daily Archives: February 21, 2020

MT: Mandamus to get SW materials from 1998 denied for complete failure to comply with mandamus statute

Mandamus to get search warrant materials from 1998 denied: “Insua’s instant petition is lacking because it does not conform to Montana statutes. He has not filed a verified petition or included an affidavit, pursuant to § 27-26-201, MCA. Insua has … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MT: Mandamus to get SW materials from 1998 denied for complete failure to comply with mandamus statute

E.D.Mich.: The person stopped telling police he knows his rights isn’t RS; his flight from an unreasonable stop wasn’t RS either

“Just as numerous courts have stated nervousness cannot be a reliable indicator of criminal activity, loudly asserting one’s right to terminate an encounter with officers does not provide reasonable suspicion for continued investigation of suspected criminal activity.” United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: The person stopped telling police he knows his rights isn’t RS; his flight from an unreasonable stop wasn’t RS either

CA8: “Other media” in a SW includes cell phones

“Other media” in a search warrant includes cell phones. United States v. Oliver, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 5035 (8th Cir. Feb. 19, 2020):

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA8: “Other media” in a SW includes cell phones

CA11: § 1983 case can’t be used as substitute for state court appeal of a 4A claim

“Mr. Lynn does not raise a non-frivolous issue for appeal. Below, the District Court granted summary judgment to the defendant officers because it concluded Mr. Lynn’s Fourth Amendment claims were barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. … [¶] The District Court … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention | Comments Off on CA11: § 1983 case can’t be used as substitute for state court appeal of a 4A claim

D.Mont.: Tracking warrant issue date was a typo; whether state law was complied with doesn’t matter in federal court

The tracking warrant issue date was mistaken. The court finds it was the latter of two dates, and the tracking occurred for only five days, within the requirements of Rule 41(e)(2)(C). Whether the tracking warrant complied with state law is … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Tracking warrant issue date was a typo; whether state law was complied with doesn’t matter in federal court

SC: Search of cell phone abandoned at crime scene was reasonable since just to determine ownership

A shooting occurred in a Taco Bell parking lot, apparently a drug deal gone bad. Three cell phones were found in the car. The police searched them without a warrant and one was defendants. The state argued abandonment (which it … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonableness | Comments Off on SC: Search of cell phone abandoned at crime scene was reasonable since just to determine ownership