Category Archives: Search

D.Nev.: Running wants or warrants on a sex offender involved in a stop didn’t violate 4A

Running wants or warrants on a sex offender involved in a stop didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. McCowan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6500 (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2021).* The affidavit for the search warrant shows probable cause. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Running wants or warrants on a sex offender involved in a stop didn’t violate 4A

CA6: 4A 1983 claim brought after state court reversal on search claim was untimely

Plaintiff’s 1983 unreasonable search claim is untimely. He brought the claim after his state appeal reversed his conviction on a bad search. “Dibrell’s claim is untimely under these rules. His detention ended on February 18, 2014, when he was released … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Search | Comments Off on CA6: 4A 1983 claim brought after state court reversal on search claim was untimely

CA3: Pro se ptf stated claim for warrantless entry into his house

The district court erred in summarily dismissing plaintiff’s case at § 1915A screening for failure to state a claim, because he did in the attempted amended complaint. “Edwards alleged that Rice lacked a search warrant when she conducted an investigation … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on CA3: Pro se ptf stated claim for warrantless entry into his house

CA9: Husband hacking wife’s work emails for divorce advantage violated SCA

Husband’s interception of his wife’s work emails for advantage in their divorce case violated the Stored Communications Act as well as her right of privacy. The district court erred in granting him summary judgment. Clare v. Clare, 19-36039 (9th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy, E-mail, Search, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on CA9: Husband hacking wife’s work emails for divorce advantage violated SCA

OR: Direction to “open the door” resulted in an unreasonable search

The officer was investigating defendant for DUII and followed him home. His knock on the door and direction to “open the door” was a command to submit to a search. The officer’s observation of defendant’s condition is suppressed. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search | Comments Off on OR: Direction to “open the door” resulted in an unreasonable search

CA9: Officer opening car door and leaning inside was a search

“Because opening the car door and leaning into the car constituted an unlawful search under the Fourth Amendment, the panel considered what remedy is appropriate in this case. The panel held that the exclusionary rule applies to the loaded handgun … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on CA9: Officer opening car door and leaning inside was a search

FL4: Police use of a flashlight isn’t itself a search

“R.F. appeals the denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence. Because we conclude appellant was not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes where the deputy used a spotlight and a flashlight to illuminate his approach of appellant, we affirm the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Search, Waiver | Comments Off on FL4: Police use of a flashlight isn’t itself a search

N.D.Miss.: In wrongful death action, officer’s subjective intent offered by 404(b) evidence is inadmissible; reasonableness is objective

Because the reasonableness standard is based on objective evidence confronting the officer, the use of 404(b) evidence here would be too extraneous to show subjective intent. “Because reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is disconnected from an officer’s subjective intent, the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonableness, Search | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: In wrongful death action, officer’s subjective intent offered by 404(b) evidence is inadmissible; reasonableness is objective

NY1: Failure to get a ruling on search issue in trial court is waiver

Failure to get a ruling on a search claim in the trial court is waiver of the issue for appeal. People v. Collins, 2020 NY Slip Op 04517, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610 (1st Dept. Aug. 13, 2020). Drug … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Search, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on NY1: Failure to get a ruling on search issue in trial court is waiver

MT: Field test of seized drugs is a reasonable search

A field test of drugs seized off defendant’s person finding them presumptively methamphetamine is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. There is no enlarged reasonable expectation of privacy as to them when seized. State v. Funkhouser, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonableness, Search | Comments Off on MT: Field test of seized drugs is a reasonable search

W.D.Wash.: Powering on a cell phone to look at the lock screen was a search intruding on defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy

Powering on a cell phone to look at the lock screen was a search intruding on defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Sam, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87143 (W.D. Wash. May 18, 2020):

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Powering on a cell phone to look at the lock screen was a search intruding on defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy

E.D.Tex.: Searching a car more than once isn’t a 4A violation

“The fact that Detective Nance searched portions of the vehicle more than once did not violate the Fourth Amendment.” Mendoza v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68469 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2020). The exclusionary rule does not apply in … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Searching a car more than once isn’t a 4A violation

CA9: County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds

County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds. Benson v. Chappell, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14035 (9th Cir. May 1, 2020). There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, but the officer’s opening the car … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search | Comments Off on CA9: County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds

CA5: A dead man is not one of the “people” of the 4A

The estate of a dead man has no Fourth Amendment claim for a search warrant allegedly unreasonably obtained after the death for aggravated assault by the deceased allegedly “‘as a pretext for investigation into [Mr.] Blanchard’s history’ and to ‘besmirch … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Search | Comments Off on CA5: A dead man is not one of the “people” of the 4A

VA: Running the serial number of a seized firearm isn’t a “search”

When defendant got out of the car, the officer could see the butt of a gun sticking from his coat pocket, so a frisk was reasonable for officer safety. Looking at the serial number and then running it to see … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on VA: Running the serial number of a seized firearm isn’t a “search”

E.D.Pa.: Use of a key fob to identify defendant’s vehicle is not a search; it’s commonly available technology under Kyllo

Use of a key fob to identify defendant’ vehicle is not a search invading a reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burgess, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206776 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2019):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Use of a key fob to identify defendant’s vehicle is not a search; it’s commonly available technology under Kyllo

CO: DHS caseworkers subject to 4A in their warrantless entry

State DHS case workers are subject to the Fourth Amendment, and their warrantless entry into defendant’s home was unreasonable. People v. Dyer, 2019 COA 161, 2019 Colo. App. LEXIS 1588 (Oct. 24, 2019). Probable cause for search of a car … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on CO: DHS caseworkers subject to 4A in their warrantless entry

CA3: A threat to violate the 4A is not a 4A violation; it is contingent for Art. III

“The Probation Department employees’ alleged threat to send Repotski back to jail does not state a constitutional violation cognizable under § 1983. See McFadden v. Lucas, 713 F.2d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 1983) (noting that mere threats do not amount … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Search, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: A threat to violate the 4A is not a 4A violation; it is contingent for Art. III

OH2: Looking through a parked car’s windows with a flashlight is not a “search”

Officers looked through defendant’s vehicle windows when it was parked with a flashlight during a nighttime stop, and that wasn’t an unreasonable search. In the vehicle was meth in plain view. State v. Brown, 2019-Ohio-3684, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3766 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Search | Comments Off on OH2: Looking through a parked car’s windows with a flashlight is not a “search”

N.D.Ohio: Almost immediate dog sniff during stop didn’t prolong it

The officer had an objective basis for the stop, so defendant’s pretext claim fails. The dog sniff occurred almost immediately during the stop and the stop wasn’t prolonged for it. United States v. Martinez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155124 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Almost immediate dog sniff during stop didn’t prolong it