Category Archives: Seizure

D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

Plaintiff sued while his criminal trespass case was pending in state municipal court. The action is stayed because plaintiff can raise his constitutional claims there. Younger also counsels that. Spiehs v. Allen, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35038 (D. Kan. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

E.D.N.Y.: Where property was lawfully seized under 4A, delayed return isn’t a 4A violation

Plaintiff finances cars. When Suffolk County seized the cars from the buyers, they were allegedly really slow in returning them to Santander. Plaintiff admits the initial seizure was lawful, so the retention doesn’t ipso facto violate the Fourth Amendment. Santander … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Where property was lawfully seized under 4A, delayed return isn’t a 4A violation

OR: Stop became a seizure when questions turned to travel plans

“Applying those principles here, we conclude that, under the totality of the circumstances, defendant was seized, at the latest, at 8:53 a.m., when Smith’s questions changed from general questions about defendant’s or P’s identity, to more probing questions about what … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: Stop became a seizure when questions turned to travel plans

E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

It’s not constitutionally required to show that a cell phone was actually used in a crime for probable cause to search it. It’s enough that it likely could have. “A law enforcement-affiant’s personal expertise combined with attestation to a defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

CA5: Cardiac arrest during police training wasn’t a 4A seizure

“Appellant Brittney Kennedy appeals the dismissal of constitutional claims she brought on behalf of her deceased husband, Marquis Kennedy, who suffered a cardiac arrest after a self-defense simulation for police-cadet training. She claims the district court erred by concluding that … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Cardiac arrest during police training wasn’t a 4A seizure

N.D.Ind.: Alleged sexual assault during citizen ride along stated 4A claim

Alleged sexual assault during a citizen ride along in a police car stated a Fourth Amendment claim. Hess v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22018 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2026). “Based on our precedent involving the use of pepper spray, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pretext, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Alleged sexual assault during citizen ride along stated 4A claim

OR: Being ordered to walk backwards toward officer with hands up is a seizure

The juvenile being ordered to walk backwards to the officer with hands up is a seizure, and here it was with reasonable suspicion. P.L. v. C.P.L. (In re C.), 346 Or. App. 499 (Jan. 22, 2026) (argued 18 months ago). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Being ordered to walk backwards toward officer with hands up is a seizure

N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure. Keith v. Romain, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13105 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2026). Police responded to a bar on a ShotSpotter report, but it was for naught. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

Defendant was in custody for Miranda when a warrant was executed at his house at 6 am and he was taken outside, separated from his family, and ziptied but told he was not under arrest. State v. Magana-Arevalo, 2026 Wash. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Custody, Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

CA8: Ricocheting bullet not a seizure

Unintended shooting target: “When an officer fires at a dog, is there a seizure of the dog’s owner when the stray bullet hits her instead? We conclude the answer is no.” Hight v. Williams,  2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 781 (8th … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Ricocheting bullet not a seizure

ID: Time on seized video was erroneous and it was within particularity of SW

The search warrant for a GoPro video was valid based on the time of the search shown on the video being erroneous. Practical accuracy is the touchstone, and the correct time could be reconstructed. The warrant was particular. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Time on seized video was erroneous and it was within particularity of SW

W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

No clear line of cases suggests the officer’s searching inside plaintiff’s underwear was unreasonable where it was not seen by anyone else. “Plaintiff’s right to be free from such a search was not clearly established at that time and Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

D.S.C.: Issuing magistrate sharing address with LE agency doesn’t make the magistrate not “neutral and detached”

The issuing magistrate is not shown to be an adjunct law enforcement officer just because the judge shares an address with a police department. Martinez v. Wilson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 268655 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2025). The search incident of … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Issuing magistrate sharing address with LE agency doesn’t make the magistrate not “neutral and detached”

CA6: Reference to water emoji 💦with dual meaning not a Franks violation

“Swanagan did not make an adequate preliminary showing that Budde’s interpretation of the water emoji was intentionally or recklessly false, so the district court did not clearly err in finding the affidavit truthful. Swanagan asserts that he ‘provided dictionary support … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Reference to water emoji 💦with dual meaning not a Franks violation

E.D.Mo.: Neither RS nor PC required for electronics search at border

Neither reasonable suspicion or probable cause is required for a border search of electronic equipment. Here, it was at Newark airport. United States v. Bill, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234680 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 2, 2025). Defendant who had 19 prior … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Seizure, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Neither RS nor PC required for electronics search at border

CA6: Zoning officer’s attempting to post a stop work order was not a seizure of real property

Defendant had no constitutional right to build a greenhouse in his front yard in violation of a city zoning ordinance, and the zoning official did not seize his property by attempting to post a stop work order on it. “While … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA6: Zoning officer’s attempting to post a stop work order was not a seizure of real property

E.D.N.Y.: SW for cell phone at border after warrantless search was reasonable

CBP seized and searched defendant’s cell phones at the border under existing authority. After subsequent case law called that into question, the government sought a search warrant for the phones disclosing all the facts. The subsequent warrant was valid. United … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: SW for cell phone at border after warrantless search was reasonable

ABA: High Risk, Low Return: The Case Against Non-Public-Safety Traffic Stops

Jared Fishman & John J. Choi, High Risk, Low Return: The Case Against Non-Public-Safety Traffic Stops, 40 Criminal Justice No. 3 at 35 (Fall 2025) (not online yet, print only)

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on ABA: High Risk, Low Return: The Case Against Non-Public-Safety Traffic Stops

GA: SW to photograph a tattoo was reasonable

A search warrant to photograph a tattoo was reasonable. Here, a sex assault assailant was described as having a particular tattoo, and defendant was the suspect. They found a matching tattoo. Grier v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 484 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on GA: SW to photograph a tattoo was reasonable

W.D.Tex.: Frequency of cell searches not a 4A claim

“Plaintiff complains of cell searches that are unscheduled or more frequent than she believes they should be. Such a claim does not state a constitutional violation. Even assuming that TDCJ policy dictates the frequency of searches, additional searches are not … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Frequency of cell searches not a 4A claim