Category Archives: Inventory

S.D.Fla.: Former lawyer could not sue Disciplinary Counsel in bankruptcy after already losing in another similar case

Plaintiff is a former lawyer who sued the Pennsylvania Office of Disciplinary Counsel alleging Fourth Amendment violations from seizure of his office files. After losing that case, he attempted to relitigate the same issue through bankruptcy court. He is collateral … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Former lawyer could not sue Disciplinary Counsel in bankruptcy after already losing in another similar case

NJ: Def was interrogated in DA’s office; inventory of her purse after lawyering up was unreasonable

Defendant was detained and being interviewed at the local DA’s office. She’d rummaged in her purse without restriction, and it was open on the table. She looked at her cell phone for the time and commented that she had to … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on NJ: Def was interrogated in DA’s office; inventory of her purse after lawyering up was unreasonable

VI: Govt couldn’t rely on inventory to justify search when the vehicle wasn’t impounded

Officer’s knowledge that defendant possessed a firearm was not reasonable suspicion in itself because one could possess a firearm in the VI, albeit with a license. When officers observed bullet holes in the car and defendant was nervous and evasive, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on VI: Govt couldn’t rely on inventory to justify search when the vehicle wasn’t impounded

D.Nev.: UPS employee conducted private search and allowing police to photograph contents did exceed private search

A UPS employee suspected contraband in a package shipped from Las Vegas to Florida, and a supervisor then opened. While it was open, police came and photographed it, and this did not exceed the private search. United States v. Washington, … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Private search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: UPS employee conducted private search and allowing police to photograph contents did exceed private search

E.D.Mich.: Franks challenge fails because there still would be PC

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails because, even accepting it as true, there’s still probable cause. United States v. Barclay, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12061 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2018).* “Probable cause ‘is not a high bar.’ Kaley v. United States, 134 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Franks challenge fails because there still would be PC

OH: A policy to take arrestee’s purse to jail with her doesn’t grant power to inventory it

“This case addresses whether a law-enforcement agency’s policy that an arrestee’s personal effects must accompany the arrestee to jail can, on its own, justify the warrantless retrieval of an arrestee’s personal effects from a location that is protected under the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on OH: A policy to take arrestee’s purse to jail with her doesn’t grant power to inventory it

D.N.M.: Inventory was reasonable on the totality, so officers’ actual intent doesn’t matter

Defendant was arrested at someone else’s home, and he had a bag. The homeowner wouldn’t take responsibility for the bag, so it went with defendant, and its inventory was reasonable on the totality. “Thus, whether or not the Officers’ testimony … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Inventory was reasonable on the totality, so officers’ actual intent doesn’t matter

D.S.D.: General description of a handyman’s tools as “miscellaneous tools” did not make the inventory “defective”

General description of a handyman’s tools as “miscellaneous tools” did not make the inventory “defective.” United States v. Bruce, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7387 (D.S.D. Jan 17, 2018). “Although the affidavit in the instant case could have provided more information … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.S.D.: General description of a handyman’s tools as “miscellaneous tools” did not make the inventory “defective”

D.Neb.: Minor mistakes on inventory paperwork don’t make the inventory unreasonable

The officer’s minor errors on the paperwork for the inventory don’t show that was pretextual for a criminal search or otherwise unreasonable. United States v. Lillard, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6613 (D. Neb. Jan. 16, 2018) (wrong vehicle model, failing … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Minor mistakes on inventory paperwork don’t make the inventory unreasonable

OR: The fact there is some officer discretion in conducting an inventory doesn’t make it violate 4A

The Salem inventory policy requires inventory of closed containers that might have something valuable in them. In defendant’s backpack was a nylon case which the officer believed might contain a computer harddrive or a computer gaming device. The inventory was … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OR: The fact there is some officer discretion in conducting an inventory doesn’t make it violate 4A

IA: Inventory was still valid despite its mixed motive to search

Defendant refused to consent to a search so the officers made the choice to impound his car. It was a reasonable choice, although with a mixed motive to search and not just inventory. Nevertheless, it’s valid. State v. Gray, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Inventory was still valid despite its mixed motive to search

IN: Officer didn’t follow inventory policy and made this a criminal search; suppressed

The inventory in this case “deviated greatly” from the impoundment policy. When a gun was found, it turned into a criminal investigation and the officer ignored the inventory. No inventory was made. Sansbury v. State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 804 … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IN: Officer didn’t follow inventory policy and made this a criminal search; suppressed