Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

D.Ariz.: Govt’s civil discovery demands don’t implicate the 4A

When the government is sued, its discovery demands do not implicate the Fourth Amendment. Arizona Yage Assembly v. Barr, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42197 (D. Ariz. Feb. 22, 2024). The obtaining of defendants CSLI before Carpenter was lawful then, and … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Govt’s civil discovery demands don’t implicate the 4A

KS: No basis for a stop of car in a local park under “public safety exception”

A public safety stop is well recognized, deriving from Cady. “In this case, however, the facts do not support a valid safety stop. The deputy stated he was concerned because it was dark, it was late, the car was parked … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: No basis for a stop of car in a local park under “public safety exception”

Cal.2d: Questions posed during a traffic stop while waiting for the records check do not extend the stop

Questions posed during a traffic stop while waiting for the records check to come back do not extend the stop. People v. Felix, 2024 Cal. App. LEXIS 154 (2d Dist. Mar. 7, 2024). Defendant’s bad search claim as part of … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.2d: Questions posed during a traffic stop while waiting for the records check do not extend the stop

W.D.N.C.: Def agreed to electronic monitoring as a condition of release

Defendant agreed to electronic monitoring as a condition of release, so it was admissible in evidence. United States v. Anthony, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40422 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2024). Defendant’s improper lane change was seen in the rearview mirror, so … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def agreed to electronic monitoring as a condition of release

Cal.2d: Questions posed during a traffic stop while waiting for the records check to come back do not extend the stop

Questions posed during a traffic stop while waiting for the records check to come back do not extend the stop. People v. Felix, 2024 Cal. App. LEXIS 154 (2d Dist. Mar. 7, 2024). Defendant’s bad search claim as part of … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on Cal.2d: Questions posed during a traffic stop while waiting for the records check to come back do not extend the stop

CA10: SW for house included detached garage next to it without even mentioning it

The search warrant for defendant’s house included the detached garage on the curtilage without having to mention it. United States v. Ronquillo, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5489 (10th Cir. Mar. 7, 2024). “And the Department of Homeland Security officers did … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA10: SW for house included detached garage next to it without even mentioning it

MO: Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person

Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person the same as jailing an alleged offender. State v. Williams, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 131 (Mar. 5, 2024). Some of the information in the affidavit didn’t provide a time frame, but … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person

N.D.Ohio: The residence had two front doors but could not be definitively determined to be two residences before search; search still valid when it was two

The residential building searched had two front doors but one address. This suggested that it might be two residences, but police investigating couldn’t find any indication that it was two, not one. In any event, the warrant was based on … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: The residence had two front doors but could not be definitively determined to be two residences before search; search still valid when it was two

NYTimes: Do You Have to Let the National Guard Search Your Bag on the Subway?

NYTimes: Do You Have to Let the National Guard Search Your Bag on the Subway? by Maria Cramer and Hurubie Meko (“Gov. Kathy Hochul would not say how long she planned to keep hundreds of soldiers and state police officers … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NYTimes: Do You Have to Let the National Guard Search Your Bag on the Subway?

D.Minn.: Cell phone that govt can’t open not in its possession for discovery purposes

Defendant’s cell phone is in the possession of the government but it can’t search it because they don’t have the pass code. Defendant’s request for discovery of the phone under Rule 16 is denied because the contents of the phone … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Cell phone that govt can’t open not in its possession for discovery purposes

GA: Officer didn’t have to distinguish between smell of MJ, hemp, and CBD to have PC to search car

Under existing precedent, the smell of suspected marijuana couldn’t be distinguished between hemp and CBD, and that was still probable cause for search of the car. Coverstone v. State, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 90 (Mar. 4, 2024). “First, Officer Murphy … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Officer didn’t have to distinguish between smell of MJ, hemp, and CBD to have PC to search car

CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

Nexus to defendant’s house was shown by two controlled buys with others who traveled back to his house afterward. United States v. Espinoza, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5147 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2024). “The warrant for appellant’s medical records was … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

N.D.Ohio: Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing

Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing. There were four packages here sent under assumed names to assumed names. The anticipatory warrant was based on probable cause. United States v. Taylor, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36749 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing

M.D.Pa.: Ordering driver out of car doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purposes

Ordering the driver out of the car is incidental to the mission of the stop and doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purpses. United States v. Brabham, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36681 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2024). While the smell of … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Ordering driver out of car doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purposes

D.Utah: Automobile exception permits search under the hood

The automobile exception permits a search under the hood, even if it is not the most likely spot to find drugs and a weapon. Here, a clip was found in the car, and the gun it belonged to under the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Automobile exception permits search under the hood

D.Kan.: Cross-designated state-federal officer was “federal officer” for assault charge during execution of SW

Assaulting a state officer cross-designated as a federal officer qualified for assaulting a federal officer during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Butler, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36172 (D. Kan. Mar. 1, 2024). The state courts did not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Cross-designated state-federal officer was “federal officer” for assault charge during execution of SW

N.D.W.Va.: “[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence.” That’s for a motion in limine

“[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence. See U.S. v. Musgrave, 726 F. Supp. 1027 (W.D.N.C. 1989) (‘As the Government contends … evidentiary issues are better addressed at trial through … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: “[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence.” That’s for a motion in limine

C.D.Cal.: Franks challenge succeeds in FIPF case

The search warrant for felon in possession was based on the officer affiant’s assertion defendant was a convicted felon but it was based on evaluation of paperwork from Georgia that showed he was a first offender without judgment of guilt … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Franks challenge succeeds in FIPF case

CA7: CI identity irrelevant because of controlled buys

This case is about fentanyl on defendant’s person, so the identity of the CI that led police to him is irrelevant under Roviaro. Controlled buys justified his arrest. United States v. Johnson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 4450 (7th Cir. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: CI identity irrelevant because of controlled buys

D.S.C.: Speeding stop justified even if dashcam video is inconclusive

The stop was justified: “In this case, although the dash cam footage is inconclusive of Officer Dudley’s visual estimate of speed, no evidence was put forth that cast doubt on Officer Dudley’s ability to estimate speed. Further, additional indicia of … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Speeding stop justified even if dashcam video is inconclusive