Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

OR: Four-hour delay in getting BAC SW supported exigency

It would take about four hours to get a BAC search warrant, and the totality of circumstances supported a warrantless blood draw before the BAC dissipated too much more. State v. Sanchez, 344 Or. App. 85 (Oct. 8, 2025):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OR: Four-hour delay in getting BAC SW supported exigency

HI: No REP in IP information

There is no Fourth Amendment protection in one’s subscriber information provided to a third-party internet service provider and its link to an IP address. State v. Brown, 2025 Haw. LEXIS 268 (Sep. 30, 2025).* The state contends defendant had no … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on HI: No REP in IP information

OH5: SW saved by GFE even if issuing court lacked jurisdiction

The good faith exception applies even if the Common Pleas court lacked jurisdiction to issue a warrant for a Dropbox account in another jurisdiction. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 3295 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025). Summary judgment … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on OH5: SW saved by GFE even if issuing court lacked jurisdiction

D.S.C.: Police and issuing magistrate having same address doesn’t make judge not neutral and detached

Just because the issuing magistrate and the police department share the same address does not prove that the magistrate was not neutral and detached. More is required. Lafoy v. O’Brien, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190411 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2025). “Even … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Police and issuing magistrate having same address doesn’t make judge not neutral and detached

Reason: Do Cops Still Need a Warrant To Search Your Home in an ‘Emergency’?

Reason: Do Cops Still Need a Warrant To Search Your Home in an ‘Emergency’? by Damon Root (“SCOTUS will soon decide.”):

Posted in Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: Do Cops Still Need a Warrant To Search Your Home in an ‘Emergency’?

W.D.N.Y.: No exigency shown for warrantless domestic entry

Based on the complaint, there were no exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless entry into the home for a domestic disturbance that had calmed way down before police got there. Intertwined is the qualified immunity claim, and there’s not enough here … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No exigency shown for warrantless domestic entry

KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

A person accused has a statutory right of access to search warrant affidavits in his own case. “The applicable provisions state only that the documents ‘shall be made available’ to defendants ‘when requested,’ without specifying to whom the request should … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

CA5: Opening refrigerator here wasn’t justified by exigency during “sweep”

Opening a refrigerator wasn’t justified by any exigent circumstances in an entry to interview children about alleged abuse. McMurry v. Weaver, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15956 (5th Cir. June 27, 2025). The dueling experts’ reports show a triable issue of … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Opening refrigerator here wasn’t justified by exigency during “sweep”

E.D.Okla.: Entry to look for shooting victim was reasonable

Officer’s entry to look for a potential shooting victim was reasonable on exigent circumstances. United States v. Bird, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112088 (E.D. Okla. May 7, 2025).* Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging defendant’s taking DNA by warrant. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Entry to look for shooting victim was reasonable

Cert. granted: Case v. Montana on emergency entries into the home without PC

Case v. Montana, 24-624 (granted June 2, 2025). Question presented: “Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.”

Posted in Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cert. granted: Case v. Montana on emergency entries into the home without PC

TX5: Warrantless removal of GSR was reasonable

Warrantless swabbing for GSR from defendant’s hands was reasonable because of exigency because it could likely be immediately lost. Argumedo v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3375 (Tex. App. – Dallas May 16, 2025). Defendant’s Franks claim is more like … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on TX5: Warrantless removal of GSR was reasonable

MI: Exigency for seeking cell phone consent doesn’t require actual knowledge def might destroy evidence on it

Defendant consented to seizure of his cell phone after officers learned there might be child sexual abuse material on it. A search warrant later issued. All this was reasonable. The officer doesn’t have to have evidence that defendant might delete … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Exigency for seeking cell phone consent doesn’t require actual knowledge def might destroy evidence on it

CA9: Arrest of def’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room

The arrest of defendant’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room. United States v. Biggs, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7696 (9th Cir. Apr. 2, 2025). The trial court erred in holding that defendant’s father who owned the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest of def’s drug runners was exigency for entry into his hotel room

PA: Contents of a closed shoebox wasn’t in plain view

The contents of a closed shoebox were not in plain view. Commonwealth v. Herlth, 2025 PA Super 73, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 138 (Mar. 24, 2025). “In sum, the evidence before the Court shows that the PGPD and the FBI … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Overbreadth, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on PA: Contents of a closed shoebox wasn’t in plain view

CA2: Exigency of potential destruction of evidence has to be “in real time”

This pro se plaintiff was the subject of a sexual assault investigation that led to officers warrantlessly entering and seizing his home for 12½ hours before getting a warrant. Summary judgment was granted the officers. Exigent circumstances didn’t justify the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA2: Exigency of potential destruction of evidence has to be “in real time”

E.D.La.: Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable

Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39113 (E.D. La. Mar. 5, 2025):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable

GA: Shouting and arguing inside is not exigency

Yelling and arguing from inside a home is not exigent circumstances. As to a second entry, the defendant’s statements about an injury were tainted as fruit of the initial unlawful entry. Refusal to consent to re-entry did not constitute a … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on GA: Shouting and arguing inside is not exigency

TX14: Def’s furtive movements with cell phone can justify exigency to seize it

Defendant’s furtive movements supported exigency that he could attempt to erase things on his cell phone thus justifying its warrantless seizure. Igboji v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 1021 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Feb. 20, 2025) (unpublished), on … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Custody, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on TX14: Def’s furtive movements with cell phone can justify exigency to seize it

CA8: Exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry into Airbnb in sex trafficking investigation

Officers had exigent circumstances for an entry into an Airbnb that was being used for sex trafficking a minor when the targets were constantly on the move from place to place. The FBI was on defendant’s tail with the minor, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA8: Exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry into Airbnb in sex trafficking investigation

IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances

The ping of defendant’s cell phone to find him when a 13-year-old girl went missing was based on exigency under state statute. Brooks v. State, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 19 (Jan. 31, 2025). All the factors supported reasonable suspicion: CI … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Geolocation data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances