Category Archives: Dog sniff

WaPo: The Supreme Court’s ‘alternative facts’ about drug-sniffing dogs

WaPo: The Supreme Court’s ‘alternative facts’ about drug-sniffing dogs by Radley Balko:

Posted in Dog sniff, SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: The Supreme Court’s ‘alternative facts’ about drug-sniffing dogs

D.Ariz.: A dog sniff of the person at the border is not “non-routine”

Defendant crossed into the U.S. at a pedestrian border crossing. A dog sniff of the person was conducted. “The Court finds that the intrusiveness of the canine search did not rise to the level of a non-routine search, which would … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Body searches, Dog sniff | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: A dog sniff of the person at the border is not “non-routine”

KS: Def was already stopped when police approached; he got out of car and locked it and was arrested; no possessory interest involved when a drug dog sniffed his locked parked car

Defendant was stopped on a grocery store parking lot, got out of the car, and locked it. He was searched incident to arrest. A little later a drug dog came and stiffed the car. Defendant was deprived of no possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Seizure | Comments Off on KS: Def was already stopped when police approached; he got out of car and locked it and was arrested; no possessory interest involved when a drug dog sniffed his locked parked car

D.Ore.: Where the detention was with RS, the fact it took an hour to get a free drug dog there wasn’t unreasonable

The officer had reasonable suspicion for detention for the dog sniff. Then it took an hour to get a drug dog there because the police were busy that night. It was not unreasonable on the totality. United States v. Krumwiede, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Where the detention was with RS, the fact it took an hour to get a free drug dog there wasn’t unreasonable

NE: For Rodriguez purposes, it doesn’t matter that the stop was at a gas station and not on the side of the road

Defendant’s reasonable detention pre-dog sniff was at a gas station and not on the side of the road. That doesn’t change the constitutional calculus. State v. Ferguson, 301 Neb. 697 (Nov. 30, 2018). “Here, the Court finds the warrant described … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: For Rodriguez purposes, it doesn’t matter that the stop was at a gas station and not on the side of the road

NYTimes: Marijuana Legalization Threatens These Dogs’ Collars

NYTimes: Marijuana Legalization Threatens These Dogs’ Collars by Stacy Crowley: Drug-sniffing dogs that are trained to detect marijuana are complicating searches where pot has been legalized. That’s forcing some into early retirement.

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on NYTimes: Marijuana Legalization Threatens These Dogs’ Collars

IL: Dog sniff at motel room door violates 4A

A 2014 dog sniff at a motel room door violates the Fourth Amendment, and a reasonably well-trained officer in Illinois would know that. Suppressed. People v. Lindsey, 2018 IL App (3d) 150877, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 807 (Oct. 30, 2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on IL: Dog sniff at motel room door violates 4A

DE: State const’l claim Caballes should be rejected would not be considered on mere plain error review

Defendant for the first time on appeal raised a state constitutional argument that Caballes on dog sniffs as searched should be rejected. The court declines to go there on plain error review. Bradley v. State, 2018 Del. LEXIS 477 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Independent source, State constitution | Comments Off on DE: State const’l claim Caballes should be rejected would not be considered on mere plain error review

PA: Request for consent to search by two officers with no dog present was not consent to a dog sniff

Defendant’s consent to two officers to conduct a search of his car didn’t extend to a dog sniff, too, because there wasn’t a dog there at the time, and that would be the common understanding. Commonwealth v. Valdivia, 2018 Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Request for consent to search by two officers with no dog present was not consent to a dog sniff

IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door

IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door because an apartment is still a “house” under the Fourth Amendment, and a different rule is unfair. An apartment dweller’s curtilage is his or her … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door

CO: Once a dog alerts on a car, there is PC, and putting dog in car wasn’t unreasonable

Once a dog alerted on a car during a stop that was valid up to that time, putting the dog inside the car wasn’t unreasonable. The officers had probable cause at that point. People v. Bailey, 2018 CO 84 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CO: Once a dog alerts on a car, there is PC, and putting dog in car wasn’t unreasonable

CA7: Pre-Collins dog sniff of car on property was valid when it happened; GFE applies

A pre-Collins v. Virginia dog sniff of defendant’s car on his property was valid under circuit law at the time it occurred, so the good faith exception requires no suppression. United States v. Velazquez, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 28445 (7th … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff | Comments Off on CA7: Pre-Collins dog sniff of car on property was valid when it happened; GFE applies