Category Archives: Burden of pleading

GA: State post-conviction petitioner arguing no “full and fair opportunity” to litigate 4A claim fails

Post-conviction petitioner trying to get around Stone on federal habeas fails. Gines v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 87 (Mar. 12, 2026)*:

Posted in Burden of pleading, Waiver | Comments Off on GA: State post-conviction petitioner arguing no “full and fair opportunity” to litigate 4A claim fails

NYCo.: Arrests can’t be suppressed

“Defendant was charged with committing specific acts of violence against an identifiable person, who reported the incident. An arrest itself cannot be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree, and defendant himself was not a suppressible fruit. Nor was he … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NYCo.: Arrests can’t be suppressed

D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents. Moss v. Jeffreys, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45716 (D. Neb. Mar. 4, 2026) (§ 60.58 n.2) 2255 petitioner’s claim that defense counsel … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

CA10: Def’s mid-trial motion to suppress can’t be justified and was waiver

Defendant’s mid-trial motion to suppress can’t be justified and was waiver. United States v. Cooks, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6547 (10th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026). Defendant’s post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal alleging conclusory violations of the Fourth and Fifth … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s mid-trial motion to suppress can’t be justified and was waiver

TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

Failure to allege what should have been suppressed if a motion to suppress had been filed is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Coyne v. State, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Mar. 3, 2026). Qualified immunity denied: … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

Plaintiff didn’t sufficiently plead a Fourth Amendment violation and overcoming qualified immunity from the officer’s seizing his notebook and perusing it and handing it to another officer. It’s his burden to deal with qualified immunity, and he didn’t adequately respond. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected

The state’s claim of exigency from potential destruction of evidence was speculative, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. As to his burglary conviction, it’s harmless, but not as to two other counts. State v. Gilliland, 347 Or. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected

OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

Pole camera observation didn’t violate the Oregon Constitution. State v. Lane, 347 Or. App. 229 (Feb. 19, 2026). Probable cause developed after the stop but before the search under the automobile exception. There was also consent. United States v. Camorlinga, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Pole cameras, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

M.D.Fla.: SW return filed outside state law time limit isn’t a Franks issue

A search warrant return outside the state law time limit by law is not a Franks issue. United States v. Davis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33100 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 18, 2026). Plaintiff “fails to specifically address, and thus waives any … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Warrant papers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: SW return filed outside state law time limit isn’t a Franks issue

D.Colo.: Large volume of emails can be seized for later narrowing search and still be particular

The email warrant was particular enough. While a large volume of information was provided by Google, it was then particularly searched, and that satisfies Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9434 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Cell phones, E-mail, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Large volume of emails can be seized for later narrowing search and still be particular

N.D.Iowa: Affidavit for SW could have been more explicit, but it still was good enough for PC

The affidavit for warrant isn’t perfect but it’s good enough for the issuing magistrate to draw inferences. “Again, the affidavit could have been improved with explicit explanations of the ‘how’ and ‘why.’ But I do not fault an experienced judge … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Affidavit for SW could have been more explicit, but it still was good enough for PC

WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

Refusal of a BAC can legitimately have civil consequences without violating the Fourth Amendment per Birchfield. Here it was a 2008 refusal that led to an interlock in 2013 that was recently violated. State v. Sparby-Duncan, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Drug or alcohol testing, Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

TX3: Motion to suppress never ruled on is waived for appeal

Defendant filed a motion to suppress but didn’t get a hearing or ruling on it. Then, at trial, made a motion in limine but that didn’t preserve the lack of probable cause issue from the motion to suppress. It’s all … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Waiver | Comments Off on TX3: Motion to suppress never ruled on is waived for appeal

E.D.La.: Parties present their issues timely, not in motions to reconsider

From 10/5 post: Defendant here satisfied his Franks burden of showing a lack of probable cause after the false information was excised. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Wells, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195302 (E.D. La. Oct. 2, 2025).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Parties present their issues timely, not in motions to reconsider

TX5: Objection to “call detail records” is not a CSLI objection

A boilerplate motion to suppress cell phone records that wasn’t specific was followed up at trial with an objection to “call detail records” was not an objection to CSLI. Griffin v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 9566 (Tex. App. – … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Standing | Comments Off on TX5: Objection to “call detail records” is not a CSLI objection

MT: Losing 4A claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in legal malpractice action

Losing a Fourth Amendment claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in a legal malpractice action. Benton v. Babcock, 2025 MT 277, 2025 Mont. LEXIS 1461 (Dec. 2, 2025). “The search warrant application contained sufficient information to support a reasonable belief … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on MT: Losing 4A claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in legal malpractice action

OH5: Pleading guilty without seeing SW materials stated enough to get post-conviction hearing

The state’s plea offer was to plead without getting any discovery. Defendant adequately pled defense counsel was ineffective for counseling this, including waiving getting access to the search warrant materials. The trial court erred in denying a hearing. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH5: Pleading guilty without seeing SW materials stated enough to get post-conviction hearing

TX1: Pervasiveness of cell phone use is nexus in a home invasion case where victim knew def

The CSLI “affidavit showed a fair probability that the cell-site location data associated with Frazier’s cell phone would further incriminate Frazier (an identified suspect in the crime at issue) by confirming that he was in the vicinity of the crime … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX1: Pervasiveness of cell phone use is nexus in a home invasion case where victim knew def

W.D.N.C.: PC for car moots Gant argument

Defendant argues that the search of his car was void under Gant because he was handcuffed outside it. There was, however, probable cause for a vehicle search. United States v. Phillips, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209424 (W.D.N.C. Sep. 3, 2025).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Nexus, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: PC for car moots Gant argument

CA5: A trespasser has no REP

A trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy when on the property trespassed upon. Here, there were numerous signs for the TX DOT saying “no trespassing.” United States v. Parkerson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26220 (5th Cir. Oct. 8, 2025). … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: A trespasser has no REP